Election Fraud Spotlight: Arizona
A closer look at election fraud in Maricopa County.
By KateAshley Clarke
Maricopa County, the most populous county in one of the key swing states determining the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, became a hotbed of contention as allegations of election fraud mounted. On December 16th, the Arizona State Senate issued subpoenas to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors calling for the release of all ballots and election equipment for an independent forensic audit.
Two months passed, and still the County Board of Supervisors had not complied with the request. On February 26th, a Superior Court judge ruled in the Senate's favor, determining that the subpoenas are "legal and enforceable." Why is the Senate still hounding Maricopa County months after the election took place?
Arizona's election was fraught with voter fraud, according to Dr. Peter Navarro's comprehensive report compiling evidence from legal cases, witness testimony, and statistical data analysis. The numbers make a persuasive case that voter fraud occurred to a degree far greater than the amount necessary to overturn the outcome of the presidential election:
To be clear, that's a rate of 24.4 possible illegal votes to every vote within Biden's victory margin – a margin which happens to be just slightly above the 10% state margin that would have triggered an automatic recount.
During the November 3rd Arizona State Legislature hearing on election integrity, Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, a Fulbright scholar who holds a PhD in data science from MIT, presented compelling evidence of a "weighted race feature" in Dominion Voting Systems. Dr. Ayyadurai's research found that Biden's Democrat voter distribution in Maricopa County was weighted at 130%, while Trump's Democrat voter distribution was reduced by -30%.
In other words, every Democrat vote for Biden counted as 1.3 votes, while every Democrat vote for Trump counted as 0.7 votes. The implications of this feature are troubling, given that Maricopa accounts for 61.22% of Arizona's total population and is the fourth most populous county in the nation.
A group of data scientists scraped raw JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) election night data from The New York Times's website to analyze Arizona absentee ballots. The results show decremented Trump votes in eight counties. As votes are tabulated, the should only ever increment. The fact that any decremented numbers appear in the data raises a major red flag.
Facebook-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) spent nearly $3 million on Maricopa County to pay ballot harvesters, provide mobile pick-up units, pay election judges and poll workers, and establish drop-boxes and satellite offices – all within Democrat strongholds. All across CTCL-funded counties, Biden improved his turnout over Clinton's in 2016 by 81%.
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors hired Pro V&V and SLI Compliance to conduct a forensic audit of its Dominion voting machines on February 2nd. Both companies "found that the tabulation system and equipment were using certified software, with no malicious hardware and software identified, and that the equipment in question was not connected to the internet." However, without comparing the electronically tabulated results against the physical ballots, how can a third party validate that the vote totals calculated by the machines are correct?
Perhaps this explains why the Maricopa County Board has fought against turning 2.1 million ballots and all voting equipment over to the Arizona State Senate for a thorough, independent forensic audit. Regardless of political party, shouldn't transparency regarding election results be the prerogative of every voter?
For more by KateAshley Clarke, visit her website, The Populist Patriot.
